Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »
8ismo8ismo 02 Dec 2025 21:55
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-667

I'll agree with Double on the point that the anomaly could probably be filled with a pump, and add onto it that nothing really prevents the Authority from executing 667-3 instances, waiting for them to die off, or a third option so they can just disassemble or try to neutralize 667-3.

It's a fun gimmick, but I'd have to say that the "actual" article is weirdly so much better and more important than the fake part that it is weird to me why would something like this even need to be censored and classified? It seems like it is there for the sake of being there.

I am not sure whether Warden's statement that remains changed between the two versions is an attempt to make the statement feel more hollow and insincere, if so it works if not it might be better to shed a little bit more context on the character's feelings and relationship with the Director, similarly how the rest of that part of the article does for the anomaly.

Otherwise, it's good.

by 8ismo8ismo, 02 Dec 2025 21:55
FunhouseFunhouse 29 Nov 2025 16:34
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » GD-OCEA

Early 2020s was a different age and its only been 4 years.

by FunhouseFunhouse, 29 Nov 2025 16:34

I feel as if from GD-East and onwards the general archetypes get less interesting. I figure there is reason for so that I can see through by spending my evening reading their dedicated pages. Otherwise, what's here is grounds for some interesting articles and power dynamics to write on.

Also fix the last paragraph.

While a the general rule of thumb

that have caused them o leave the position

decisions were made at at certain periods.

by FunhouseFunhouse, 29 Nov 2025 16:21

http://rpcsandbox.wikidot.com/book-of-worms

(this one will be linked in the main article and is part of the same storyline)
http://rpcsandbox.wikidot.com/book-of-worms1


They are rage, brutal, without mercy. But you. You will be worse.

Autumn field and silver fog by JokezmJokezm, 21 Nov 2025 14:03
FunhouseFunhouse 21 Nov 2025 01:35
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-809

Man what sickly mood was I in to rate this 3? 5 stars. You can sense real anger in this.

by FunhouseFunhouse, 21 Nov 2025 01:35
Re: Midas's Ring by DoubleDenialDoubleDenial, 20 Nov 2025 03:17
Midas's Ring by perc300perc300, 20 Nov 2025 00:12
FunhouseFunhouse 19 Nov 2025 17:12
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-026

Felt I was reading the National Geographic for a bit here, it's really convincing how you've explained it here. I think it's perfectly adequate as is but I find the redactions random and were better suited to point to regions in the sea where ships are mysteriously sinking, for instance. Or hell even anywhere innocuous too cause it doesn't illicit any curiosity why a territory and timeline of deadly hordes of fish is redacted. What, precious carnivorous caviar? LOL

Nitpicks aside, 4 stars. Longray Fangjaw 3D when?

by FunhouseFunhouse, 19 Nov 2025 17:12
FunhouseFunhouse 19 Nov 2025 16:33
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-166

Bare bones. Cool monster but the article isn't finished by any means. Odd inclusions of hazards that point to nowhere like its sapience and arbitrary conprocs (why titanium against microbes?) that don't utilize its equally arbitrary aversion to water. A more efficient protocol would be to completely fill it with pool water and add cat-light strobes emitting diffused light. Which, come to think of it, would've made for a better picture, knowing in this empty pool there is a flesheating microbe waiting to grow and consume you, than a pitch black containment room.

There is unspecific writing that bring down the immersion like

RPC-166 is still able to overwhelm and consume a staff member under certain circumstances.

This really is unfinished, which I understand given the excitement from RPC just becoming a thing but this really lacks anything to look back on. Still I like the visual of revealing a monstrous blob deteriorating in a flash; Sloshing sounds in the dark to it melt immediately hahaha. Also somewhat funny to think the 99.9% microbe eradicated is applicable here.

I wish it expanded on that or anything at all for that matter. 2 Stars

by FunhouseFunhouse, 19 Nov 2025 16:33
FunhouseFunhouse 17 Nov 2025 18:25
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-286

What a menace.

This has to be one of the best on the site. It's so extreme in its comic premise that it reverts back to being scary. I typically find it lazy when a monster is written to have arbitrarily punishing consequences to containment attempts but here it pushes that to great absurdity. I can't believe this is a 2018 article.

by FunhouseFunhouse, 17 Nov 2025 18:25
FunhouseFunhouse 17 Nov 2025 00:49
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-265

Was scratching my chin till I read they decompose into hamburger meat, then my eyes popped out in interest. Novel till we get to the event and incident logs then it turns truly scary. The descriptions of their untimely bloated deaths is so vivid and gnarly. Good shit. 5 St- Ough.. ouurrrrrrrrrrrrp

by FunhouseFunhouse, 17 Nov 2025 00:49
FunhouseFunhouse 16 Nov 2025 22:40
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-394

I love the concept and the interview prose; it is handled so well. The closing statement drives the point home. I also like how it goes over Judas' biblical story briefly as I was ignorant of it before this, but that's definitely just me being THAT ignorant haha.

Perhaps I'm alone on this but I have no idea what the artistic interpretation relates to the discovery description or where 394 is. Otherwise this ends on a real high note I can ignore my confusion there. 5 Stars.

by FunhouseFunhouse, 16 Nov 2025 22:40
FunhouseFunhouse 16 Nov 2025 21:53
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-272

Personally reminded me of Let the Right One In, some Swedish film where vampire kids fuck up the townspeople. I suppose the childish nature of these massacres have a funny thing to it, as well as the freaky nature of their onslaught creepy, but I have to agree that the authority is barely involved with this thing when they absolutely would engage the anomaly and document that event at least.

A nitpick, but I would have liked to hear what containment protocols would be in place if someone was already engaged in a 272 event. Run or play along? And what would be the special considerations to keep them from getting agitated? Especially for civilians if they were to engage it, a cultural program to encourage snowfights.

I like the urban legend feel it gives off. 3 Stars.

by FunhouseFunhouse, 16 Nov 2025 21:53
DoubleDenialDoubleDenial 16 Nov 2025 13:17
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-557

I greatly enjoyed your review!

the depiction of a semi-organic interior to human infrastructure reminded me, not without some time recollecting, of The Heart in GTA IV's Statue of Happiness.

Around the time I was finalizing the article, I made the same connection. I don't think it was a direct inspiration, but it's a similar metaphor.

Do you notice a reoccurring theme of anomalies taking something bodily or corporal from people in your RPCs?

I never had before, but that seems like a pretty good read on my psyche.

by DoubleDenialDoubleDenial, 16 Nov 2025 13:17
FleshwardFleshward 16 Nov 2025 02:08
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » RPC-557
by FleshwardFleshward, 16 Nov 2025 02:08

Is it getting hot in here, or is it just me?

The first photo is "Opening door to underground garage" by Downtowngal, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 (modified). The second photo is "parking garage" by Dean Hochman, licensed under CC BY 2.0 (modified). Audio was sourced from the public domain.


I mean i didn't make it longer.. and secondly i wanted to make something different than other Rpcs. And secondly theres no similarities to scp-082 what's similarity? The measurements?. Thirdly i didn't know i would need a Event like containment breach

And as for my English i apologise because am Trying hard to make it better

First of all, make sure to capitalize properly. Proofread your draft for incomplete sentences, run-ons, sentence fragments, and typos. I found plenty just by skimming. It's a near-instant dealbreaker when readers can tell you didn't bother to proofread your own draft. Also, remember to use metric units in clinical tone, not inches or shoe sizes.

I try to look past presentation and enjoy the concepts regardless, but this draft is uneventful. The biggest chunk of it is repetitive and somewhat superficial physical detail ("always wears"? but what if it doesn't?) and the character seems suspiciously similar to SCP-082. I did find the "highly advanced sensory perception" and the idea of relying on a two-faced superhuman in a stressful situation interesting, but nothing happens with it or anything else in the article; while description-only articles can work, they need a strong sense of purpose.

You need to work on your English skills, and the draft needs to better utilize its concept and differentiate itself from what's already been done. You shouldn't post it as-is.

page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License