RPC-351 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page RPC-351.

RPC-351

Tactical Nuke 15 Dec 2018 07:29

here's crit:

http://www.rpc-wiki.net/forum/t-9102922/draft:rpc-351-symphony-of-tantrics

H F Dummie 20 Dec 2018 15:26

I like the idea of such instruments, but I don't find the part where it attracts people into playing it to be a good idea.

Furthermore, I don't understand the part with the Hindu Gods. What were they doing there? It's a bit underdeveloped and to be fair, 351 works fine without them.

The letter at the end suffers from the same issue. It feels out of place. Why would such a problem be pointed out specifically? NYC's 432 Procedure worked, as far as the document goes.

There are also some tonal errors, such as:

the signal will be so loud

How loud? 150 dB? 100 dB? 0 dB?

In case of failure of Procedure 432-Jakarta

Double "of". Not a recipe for grammar. Also, better to use the term "In the event of".

I suggest proofreading it a few more times, or gaining a better understanding of "clinical tone".

(account deleted) 24 Jan 2019 15:03

Numerical designations need to be changed, remove the parentheses.

The concept here is quite literally impossible. While it is plausible for it to be an undiscovered piece, it is not possible for it to be completely unheard of. Music itself is extremely derivative by nature, and it's impossible for a completely original piece of music to exist in this day and age.

In addition, the compulsion is lame, and the effect is just a generic disaster. Of course, this concept was explored to a fegree as part of a much larger anomaly in one of my articles.

Overall, this is too ungrounded to be technical, and too grounded to feel whimsical. Not much within this that could be saved as is, imo.