I don't take into account attached "peripheral" pages for my final rating, and have not fully read it yet.
I found it to be hovering on an "alright" rating. Maybe a 4 because rat-kings are so fucking weird. I have grievances though that I will express.
First: Fuck using images in the hazards list. I genuinely despise whoever first did that, as it is one of the worst trends to be somewhat popular on the RPC. I don't want to waste time trying to remember what these pictograms mean, I want to read the hazards and get on with the page. They should not take anymore effort than "Oh, I have registered that".
Second: Fuck cordyceps. That is completely my own personal opinion and it did not impact on my rating of this page, but I cannot stand cordyceps. The entire genus has been bled dry of anything "spoopy". I understand that it works from a practical sense, hence why it did not impact on my rating.
Third: Fuck "pop up messages". I should not have to stare at a spot waiting to get a chance to read some generic spoop, nor should I have to go into the source code to make sure I haven't missed anything. Just make the text slightly darker white if you wanna hide spoops.
Fourth: Fuck zaglo. This, did have an impact on my opinions of this piece. My line of logic goes that if I see zaglo, I remove a star. I cannot stand zaglo, and do consider its use a detriment to most things published.
I enjoyed the actual effects of the anomaly, but certain format-breaking choices felt awful. The memetic screening image hurt my eyes to look at, I already expressed my hatred of zaglo, and my dislike of "pop up messages".
3 stars.