Did you make a forum post for this? Or did you get discord crit before the forum rule was implemented?
I got some criticism sometime ago, although i wasn't fully aware of tales needing crit. Feel free to give it now, but know this is a progressive piece. It'll be updated every time something becomes official. And i know it mentions a few unofficial things right now, but i'm invested in helping make them official to ensure they pan out
I do remember me and some other people critiquing the general idea and/or first draft of this in a group dm, and that was before the forum rule was implemented
While there are some interesting concepts within the history itself, the way the article is presented is just kind of messy. I know this is a work in progress, but the bits that are 'finished' don't really feel like they've undergone much polish, and at some points devolve into what feels like barely-edited point form notes instead of a consistent narrative. You've also got weird capitalization throughout. 3 Stars until it recieves a heavy, heavy edit or reupload.
Don't worry, i'm looking into fixing it soon
Update: It's been a couple of hours and i've edited most of the draft (as soon as i took a good look through it, i realised how off most of the grammar and bad the flow was. I'm honestly surprised). And i also added in a few more GOIs that i'm supporting to make them official. I've talked with the creators of the GOIs and attempted to keep them very close to how they envisioned them. So far, they all seem happy with what i've done
I recently added in The union (whose role will once again change due to input from the creator) and i realised i never explained something.
This is a continuously changing piece, which will mention and edit to include big events in the Authority's history AS MADE BY WRITERS. (can't stress that last part enough)
So everything in this timeline that isn't mentioned/seen on the main site, is either being worked on, or I got really lazy, feel free to contact me if things need updating