RPC-084 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page RPC-084.

PathetiqueSoul 08 Apr 2019 09:37

Short but incredibly eerie.

OddWinters 19 Apr 2019 15:50

Good but I think it needs some more detail and/or a picture to really sell it

pogchamp 23 May 2019 18:31

Now this is what I call some fine china. Definitely creepy. :poggers:

Prototype_Toaster 27 Oct 2020 15:54

Idk if the author was intending this but

+ show block

PCAAO purposely made this virus to turn people in to "fine china" to boost their economy. That's why they are refusing to cure it (even though they probably know how to) and are only helping out with research. Then they'd probably use that research to make a "lab accident" and turn more people in to fine china.

If that is what the author was going for, then 4/5 for something clever but simple.

DoubleDenial 23 Dec 2020 19:27

Didn't scare me as much as I'm assuming it was supposed to, and the plot twist left me feeling completely indifferent. The addendum could be phrased better, 3/5

DoubleDenial 18 Feb 2022 02:01

After re-reading this article over a year later it has grown on me, much like the porcelain on these children. This article is short and simple, but also quite scary.

Actually, I'm not sure if "scary" is the right word. It doesn't really scare me at all, but I still delight in the "wrongness" of it. Black comedy, I suppose. 5/5

(Some of the writing is a little awkward, as I mentioned in the previous review. Most notably, the description for the 30-day symptoms is comma spliced as all hell. Not really a big deal.)

(Edit: This review was modified as part of the "DoubleDenial Hides His Worst Reviews" program. Just had to make myself look like less of a moron, that's all)

Last edited on 01 Oct 2022 18:52 by DoubleDenial Show more