My god, I didn't like this one at all. It feels like a mess of statements that don't connect together. There are many marks of what could lead to something interesting throughout the containment protocols, description, and addenda, yet there just isn't any payoff or conclusion.
The emergence events lead to RPCs where the discovery logs on their own pages don't line up with the article. The interview log felt unnatural and off. The other info was just… there I guess. It felt like the author didn't really know where to take the idea. And its all for a concept that I find to be generic.
Maybe it could be reworked into something more meaningful, taking advantage of the "finding anomalies" idea. But whatever, I just don't like it right now. 1 star.