RPC-432 / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page RPC-432.

H F Dummie 18 Sep 2018 14:45

I like the danger it poses. However, there are still tonal and grammatical errors.

Download Grammarly.

Also, "humanoid" can be changed to "subjects" or "individuals".

A very reserved 4 here.

Carnegiea Gigantea 13 Feb 2019 22:27

I think it is great but, you do need to correct the spelling. Just download an application on your computer so you can fix it. Everything else 5 stars.

Metallic-Urchin 09 Apr 2019 05:38

It's a good execution of a good idea, I loved it.

DoubleDenial 14 Feb 2022 01:02

The idea was alright, but I don't really think it went anywhere.

The test log was a little amusing even so, though I'm not entirely sure why. The redaction kind of ticked me off; it felt like a cheap attempt to give the article an unearned sense of direction and development.

The audio log felt mostly unnecessary (I've heard religious rambling before. I don't need an example, especially this late into the article), though it was kind of unintentionally(?) amusing how quickly it ended.

I think that's the best thing I can give this article. Amusing for the duration it takes to read, but directionless and not very clever. If even only the procedure of the redacted test were given, I feel the article would have a bit more value. For now, I can only give it a 3/5.