This article has the potential to be a pretty good article but in its current state, I am giving it 3/5 stars.
The tonal and grammar mistakes were minor so I will spare that from my critique. I can go through those if you ask.
The article starts off pretty shit but gets better as you read through. A lot of the description was drawn out and not very interesting. It seems weird to me that the Authority would just assume that the pictures were being taken by an “entity”, when it could also be that the pictures manifest after the fact without any actual camera involved.
I think that you should say in the description as part of the anomaly that people viewed in the tapes often go missing or die soon after. This seems like an important part of the anomaly that should not just be implied.
Also, for tape 4, I think the Authority would have more than a hunch that the box contained RPC-098. If they have the anomaly in containment, they must have gotten it from somewhere. Most likely the police turned it into the national government which in tern sent it to the Authority. They would have known the information that the package in tape 4 was RPC-098.
Finally, I really enjoyed the direction you went in for the addendum. I thought tape 26 was a very interesting change in direction for an otherwise pretty bland anomaly. I would go into more detail in the addendum and focus more on this because it is much more interesting. You spent way too much time waffling on about how an entity can’t use the camera.
I think you could shorten the description to not include as much uneccesary information. I would also consider changing the test logs. I think it would be better if you had more of them accessable and they became increasingly more interesting and more horrific. It could also be cool to have tape 25 accessible, and it’s something that would lead into tape 26. Perhaps tape 25 could be nothing more than the words “I AM ALWAYS WATCHING” on the screen for 3 hours.
In conclusion, you got a real good concept here but the execution could use a lot of work. I could see myself rating this 4 or 5 stars if it goes through a lot of changes.