This is a good. I do think that it should be Beta though, seeing as it is animate and hostile. Also, $100 isn't that much, it doesn't really seem to be that "greedy" if that's all it wants. Maybe more like $1000.
I made the greedy part based on the average amount people carry in their wallets. 100 bucks is around 5 times the regular amount that americans carry in their wallets.
I would add a picture but I don't own any leather bi-fold wallets to snap a picture of. I might head out in a few days and grab one.
This is pretty funny so upvote, but I agree with Tdw that it should be classed as Beta due to the fact that you can't just leave it alone without doing something first.
This is a good RPC, I like it a lot, but it would be remiss of me to not point out that under the Containment Protocols for -006 you say it is "stored within Beta storage locker 23," while the Object Class for the RPC is Alpha. I'd fix the error myself, but I'm new here and don't want to meddle with anything until I'm more familiar with the Authority. Otherwise, great job. Upvoted.
Now that you mention it, I do see potential confusion in that sentence. I meant "Beta storage locker" as in there are sections of lockers, not classification, because I lacked the foresight to realize classification and what I meant are the same words. That was just me being an idiot, my bad, I'll change it if enough people complain.
Very good, I only have two questions.
1. Since it's sentient, shouldn't it be classified as a beta?
2. Why is it tagged as a reproductive RPC?
Pretty good +1
Few questions though:
$100 is a round number and kinda dull, would it be more curious for it to require say $103.24?
How or why is this tagged as reproductive? Do you mean that the effects/anomaly are easily reproducible, or that it can actually a-sexually reproduce and create offspring?
Any tests done to see what happens if it does not obtain the desired amount of currency over an extended period of time? Does it get more dangerous, frantic?
A long shot, but has there been any attempts to communicate with it? Maybe slipping bits of paper with questions into its pouch or something? Recording its movements like Morse code or something?
Any testing done on its materials, or like x-rays/MRIs etc? What is is that makes this thing tick? That's what I think the Authority would be attempting to figure out.
1. While yes, 100 is a dull number it is the best number for the article because having a super specific one would not serve the article and simply add a few more characters, while making it more annoying to read.
2. I did not tag it as reproductive, I have no idea why someone else did, I removed the tag.
3 and 4. I will write testing logs eventually, but I don't foresee it happening in the near future.
5. The thing that makes it tick is cold, hard cash-money. All the other stuff " x-rays/MRIs" would be extra info that would just serve to clutter the article. If it were special in ways that would be picked up in those ways I would have put in the description.
Sorry if this came off as rude, I have a very blunt way of speaking, I am not insulting you, or your ideas.
I like it. Surprised I haven't read this before, well done.
Within the Containment Protocols, Site-04 is referred to as Site 04. This is incorrect.
I liked this article but I think it would be a little more interesting if the currency within the wallet would be consumed on a weekly basis. Maybe like $40 a week is consumed so that more money has to be constantly fed to the object so that it doesn't just always sit inert in a locker.
(account deleted)