First of all, make sure to capitalize properly. Proofread your draft for incomplete sentences, run-ons, sentence fragments, and typos. I found plenty just by skimming. It's a near-instant dealbreaker when readers can tell you didn't bother to proofread your own draft. Also, remember to use metric units in clinical tone, not inches or shoe sizes.
I try to look past presentation and enjoy the concepts regardless, but this draft is uneventful. The biggest chunk of it is repetitive and somewhat superficial physical detail ("always wears"? but what if it doesn't?) and the character seems suspiciously similar to SCP-082. I did find the "highly advanced sensory perception" and the idea of relying on a two-faced superhuman in a stressful situation interesting, but nothing happens with it or anything else in the article; while description-only articles can work, they need a strong sense of purpose.
You need to work on your English skills, and the draft needs to better utilize its concept and differentiate itself from what's already been done. You shouldn't post it as-is.
