I sense considerable improvement from your earlier work here. The description is more organized and the blend of danger and joyous imagination had me grinning from ear to ear. The test logs are well realized, if straightforward. I'm decently impressed by the narrative integrity of these isolated episodes and how much more palpable they make the anomaly. Test #35 holds real emotional weight.
Though I understand why you didn't want to close the article with that, the final log is an unfunny letdown of an ending and I think it might single-handedly knock down other ratings. This is not a "punchline article", and the contrast is irksome instead of whimsical as I assume was intended. The discovery note is also disappointingly glib. It almost taps into an emotional heart with Anno's story and vision of "perfection" but falls into stale mad scientist babble—an IOU of real character.
So, I enjoy it for the most part, but it has blips to call the sense of direction into concern. I think some relatively minor rewriting could help it go down a lot easier. It's still likable and quite memorable as-is.
I also think you could come up with a better title than "GOJIRA!" with italics.
Making eye contact with the figure in the photograph transports subjects, hereafter referred to as RPC-685-1, to an area resembling Eastern Tokyo as depicted in Godzilla (1954), hereafter referred to as RPC-685-A.
First of all, "Godzilla (1954)" was in the previous sentence (just say "the film"). The bigger problem is "RPC-685-1". Don't do this. The subject is not part of the anomaly. Doing this only begets word salad like "RPC-685-1 instances will replace specific RPC-685-B instances" that would be infinitely clearer referring to "the subject", when designations should really always simplify things.
RPC-685-A is inhabited by multiple RPC-685-B and one entity labeled RPC-685-G, both of which follow the script of Godzilla.
Speaking of, avoid using designations in the description before you define them; it's clunky. Nobody cares about the labels. Introduce them properly.
(Calling it RPC-685-G instead of RPC-685-C is also pretty tacky for trying to establish a serious tone.)
resulting in every object appearing to be black, white, or grey.
This suggests tricolor: consider "greyscale" or "shades of grey".
The buildings inside RPC-685-A may also display anomalous properties.
This sentence communicates next to nothing. The next sentence does elaborate, but this suggests more functionality that isn't explained.
Some of the footnotes are distracting and cumbersome. The Academy footnote could be functionally replaced by a hyperlink to their hub.
The final test is missing a "Status" entry for whatever reason.
.jpg){kind=link}