If UNAAC officials ask, say it's a liaison under Article 5, Clause 7b of the 1997 Bretagne Agreement - I’m told it works wonders when it comes to anomalies changing hands.
I really like this sentence but it feels a bit out of place in a document a lot of people can read, like it's supposed to be advice given on the DL and maybe a dozen people can see it now. Maybe change the collapsible text so it's made clear that it's for a single person or maybe a few to read?
Also not sure what "it's a liaison" is supposed to mean. It's written like you say liaison in the sense of intermediary person, but the greater context implies the subject of the sentence (the 'it') to be the anomaly itself.
When in the presence of an active anomaly,2
2. Designated as an anomaly whose properties are currently in effect.
NO SHIT
Did you get specifically asked for this footnote? It's kinda a no brainer explanation, really can't imagine a world where you can't immediately guess what active anomaly means.
approved by the MPDR
You can probably not acronymize this the first time you use the term tbh. I know you use it earlier in the letter but using the full name once in the text of the actual file feels better tbh.
It is unknown whether or not Bardales was aware of the exponential increase of his sculpture's area of effect in such a crowded space and with more than three dozen passive anomalies.
The incident doesn't really click for me cause there's not been a lot of visual info given about how groves aberrations actually look or behave (aside from the footnote which is really little). I feel like there's some really compelling imagery to explore with this whole art gallery going insane that you never quite go to. Same goes for that final incident — like, I can sense the "reactor meltdown" kinda feel in there but there's not enough visual context to really know what's happening aside from the gold tubes turning to lead.
gave me particular lessons
Personal lessons.
The strings holding the gold-lined sheet, which has turned to lead as well, break.
Honestly feels like a very short sighted mechanism if it's well known that gold turns to lead when it's exposed to a fuckton of Groves. If I understand it right, they put the statue in the warehouse because they kinda didn't know what else to do with it and the "Utility" designation is more of an incidental benefit than something they actively pursued (with all the moving-around that has to happen whenever it fluctuates) so it doesn't make sense to me that they'd not figure out this was a possibility