Wording and Terminology Crit”
“6. In exchange for reduced disciplinary action.”
Why does Weaver have disciplinary action against him? For an anomaly messing with his computer while he was doing his job? Is it reduced for future infractions? I think you should get rid of this footnote, expanding it would be filler and it serves no purpose for the greater article.
So usually in this section I put in all the wording mistakes, misspellings, terminology errors, or flow issues here. Slight problem, I can’t really find anything noteworthy here to actually point out except for one thing. I’m actually impressed, this hasn’t happened before and I’m not 100% sure what to do since you messed up my whole critting format. So, I’m just gonna skip to the overall crit.
Overall Crit:
I am in love with this concept. I typically don’t like these wholesome articles but there’s just something about the way the concept is executed that makes me really enjoy it. The idea of this fragment of a deity spending his time playing Gmod sounds like a joke article, but you just make it work. Fantastic stuff.
In terms of grammar, it’s almost perfect with just one teensy bit of strangely out of place fluff. But it’s in the footnotes making it such a minor complaint that it hardly warrants talking about. It is fantastic that you have an article that starts out so good grammar wise, but I hate you for messing up my crit format.
Overall, this is a really good article, I would probably rate this 4 or 5 stars if it got to the mainlist. It’s a very simple article and that’s not a bad thing. Simple works fantastic here, it says what it needs to then ends. No dragging out, no bloat, no filler. Good shit.
As one final note, I wonder how good Pilot would be at TTT.