the game
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣀⣀⣐⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⢠⠄⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⣛⣂⣀⣀⡒⠶⣶⣤⣤⣬⣀⡀⠄⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⡟⢡⢾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣌⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⣄⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⣈⣉⡛⣿⣿⣿⡌⢇⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⣡⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠺⠟⣉⣴⡿⠛⣩⣾⣎⠳⠿⠛⣋⣩⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠘⢋⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠄
⠄⠄⢀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠄
⠄⠄⠄⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⣀
⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠃⠘⠛
⠄⠄⠄⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⣀⣀⣠⣤
⠄⠄⣀⣀⡙⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⢛⣩⠤⠾⠄⠛⠋⠉⢉
⠄⠺⠿⠛⠛⠃⠄⠉⠙⠛⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠟⠛⠛⠛⠉⠁⠄⠄⣀⣀⣠⣤⣠⣴⣶⣼⣿
They are rage, brutal, without mercy. But you. You will be worse.
̵̢̨̧̡̡̥͎͉̦̲̟̣̥͙̬̝̳̘̟̟̘͇͔̱̤͚͚͙̞͚̲̗̖͈̲̩̗̜͙͖̙͛̕͜͠ ̷̡͉͙̫͇͉̦̠̹̉̇̆̓̀͆͗̈͒͐̐́͊̄̍͆̾̎͜ͅ ̸͇̪͔̻̣̭͓̗̼̺̲̥̟̰̘̼̫̤̦̘͛̌̕ͅ ̵͓̙͔̻̒̿͆͊̆̋̉͗͒͌̓̃̓̿̈͌͑̄̓͝͠ ̶̨̡̛̛̩̝̜̠̭̼̩̥̲͖̼̰̣̟̹̯͖͍̥̩̲̯̣̝̮̠͚̘͈͐͂̊̈́̈́̆̽́́̓͆͑̿͆̈́̔̿̆́̅̊̿̊̄́̐̊̈̐͛̅͌̕͜͜͝ ̴̧̧̨̰̲̰̫͕͎͇̞̩̗͉̻͔͔̬̯̲̳̟̖̽̂̓̀̌̋͆̀͐ ̸̧̢̧̧̨̨͕͙̰̗͇̳̭͖̫͎̺̼̭̖̗͓̦̻̮͖͓͎͕̭̟͈̮̩̮̎̎̍́̑̿̎̆̂̀̍͗̔̀̒̈̌̔͛̀͒̈́̈́̍͊̎̀̕͜͝ ̸̜̮̘̲̞̞̭̬͍͈̰̬̞͉͎̳̩͙̭̥̲̦̖̜͈̲̬̥͎̝̯̙̝̜̇͂̽͗̊̇͗͋̿̈͝ ̸̛̛̻͔̟̭̞̘̫͔̘͖͓̦̘̞̾̐́̊̄̈́̄͛͐͊͊̓̑̒̏̂̊̓̂̀̓͌̎̉͆̈́̏̑̓̏̚̕̚͜͝͝͝ ̵̧̢̨̨̛̪͎͈̙͈̞̤̩̤̲̥̰̲̪̜̮̪̼̗͈̞͓̘̮̣̱̎̓̀̏͂̈́̌̽̒́͐͒̏̒̔̕̚͠SUS ̸̥̈́̇͊̊̆̆ ̶̡̨̛̜̩͚̪̤͕̭͙̼̩̜̙̟̰͉̠͇͇͖̥̪̤̼͍͈͇̯̞̟̳̘̪̖̬͕̐͋̀͗͛̔͐͑͆̊͗̔̓̀͌͊̉̊́̋͗̊́̔̆̐̊͐̔̃̌̔͆͐̀̔̌̕͝͠͝ͅ ̵̨̡̧̡̪̠̰͕̦̘͉̳̻͓̜̣̳̘̻̜̖͇͎̥̘͇̥̤̱̭̪͎̯͙̬̠̙̠̥̓͛̄̂̀̐̈́͊̂̑͗͆͊̓̎͒̀̄͋̿͛̅̿̅̕̚͠ ̸̧̡̢̡̢̨͚̼̣̪̪̪͎͙͎̺̺̰̗̙͍͕̦̙̻̫̮̻͎͙̝̤͙̯̬̫̠̭̗͎̉͐̂̃̏͆͒̅̅̋̌͐̏̀̊̈́͠͠ ̷̧̧̨̡͔͕͔̝͚̤͉̯̘̬̩̲͔̼̗̳̠̩̙̼̖̝͉͙̩̪̝̠̤̮̦͇͖͕̓̑͌̎ͅ ̶̡̞̠̞̖̻̺̇̊̾̕͜ ̴̡̧̬̖͙͇̠͓͈̮͎̯̩̻̬͇̯̞͇̺̣̣͙̙͇̻̞͙̫̭̉̈̇̈́̈́͐̾͜͝ ̸̢̧̢̡͚̬̤̙͔̙̳̻̜̟̯͚̜̳̼͍͙͇̠̍̇̋͒̈́̎̀̆̏̈͊̏͑͋̀̂͂̏̑̍̃̽̾̎̓̿̽̕͘̚̕͘ ̸̡̛̞̫͔̝̼̘̭̝͕̯̰̪̑̆̆͛̀̆͆̍̇̀̇́͌͒͆͋̈́̇̇ ̶̡̢̢̹̮̣̜̰͓̤͍͚̱̼͈̖̯̯̝̦̠̞̺͕̆͂̔͊͜ ̷̡̮͔͇̲̲͚̭̤̹͈͉͔͔͔̳͔̍͒̈̉̈͛̒͗̓̊̈́͒̄̈́̾̐́̓͘̚͝͝͠ ̷̢̡̧̡̢̡̥̥̞̘̲̳̰̻̳͙̖͚̰̪͍̳͓̹̞͓͚̹̞̪̬̗̩͍͖̟͍̬͕͔͑͌͋̅͜͠͠ͅ ̴̢̢̨̧̝̰̠̟̣̥̮̤̮͚̩̳̟̖͎͉̪̰̬͈̩̻̯̝͖̥͎͎̦̹̞͖̓̐̓̈̃̃̿͝͝ͅͅͅ ̵̧̢̨̛̝̥͚͓̭̠̞̬̯̗͈̖̹̲̗̯̤̟̜̘̻̫͚̺̼̣̙͇̻̯̣̬̪̩̑̅͒̐̎̓̾̂̾͘͜ͅ ̴̨̡̡̛̜͓̘̫̗͙͚̼̗̜͖̩̼͎͙̬̪̳̳͓͚͚̞̩̝̫̳̻͍͗̆̀̇͋͊̄̍̆̉̉̅́̈̏͌̇̈́͌͆͋̾͋̒̍͑̃̇̿̄̕͜͠͝͝ͅͅ
This is one of the central problems in the discussion. At the level of explanation, it is thought that the sciences must discover general laws, regularities, making no relation with the social conditions in which they are developed. and fundamentally there is a conviction that the problems are of the same nature as the problems of the social sciences. From a reading the object of the social sciences is profoundly linked to social meanings and only and only by taking into account this specificity could we speak of laws or models. could we speak of laws or models. It is not out of place to state here that there are at least two major problems in this discussion: the way in which the social sciences are problems in this discussion: the form in which the explanatory hypotheses appear, and the questions concerning and the questions concerning their validity. The way in which this tension is resolved this tension will give rise to very different positions. The naturalistic interpretation is based on the understanding that the objective of the social sciences is the same as that of the natural sciences. Data collection, discovery of correlations, formulation of verifiable empirical generalizations. At the heart of scientific explanation there must be laws or nomological statements. The task of the social scientist is to describe and explain social phenomena as faithfully as possible. The important thing was to apply the Method; this consisted in making observations, induction, which served as a hypothesis, and this was tested by subsequent observations or controlled experiments. by means of subsequent observations or controlled experiments. The latter would would confirm or invalidate a prediction. If confirmed, a further deduction of the hypothesis could be made. further deduction could be made from the hypothesis. The key to the verification process was the prediction. As long as they were verified it worked, otherwise the hypothesis was changed. The social sciences, it is argued from another point of view, require understanding between individuals.
funnier than any -J on this godforsaken site
blabbo
Yeah I completely agree with this pick.