Well, what an article.
I'm disappointed not as many people got to see your article, Bookshelf, but it was good. Idk why the clinical tone is so janky, but it isn't bad. Like, a few sentences seem hard to read, but the wording's there and everything. The narrator is a bit hard to follow: You aren't supposed to use personal pronouns in a clinical document.
But what it makes up for in narrative. It's hard as fuck to follow, but it kinda reminds me of the thing but with rocks, so it's less of an eldrich existential problem and more akin to climate change but out of this world… literally. Either way, if you cleaned up the tone it'd be a 5, but how the piece is written knocks it down to a 4.5/5.
PS: This part is so random, it has nothing to do with the prior subject matter. Why even add it?
"Staff are heavily advised to refrain from using the term "Retarded illegal alien gardeners" in reference to RPC-353 despite it not being inherently inaccurate. Professionalism is highly valued within the authority as well as mutual respect. RPC-353 despite lacking in intelligence is an utmost threat to the safety of humanity and must be treated accordingly in every way."
