I wrote this article with H F Dummie. He's cool. Also this is a reupload due to raids lol
The image is from here.
This article takes a look at the history of the Authority, and how it wasn't very good. Read n' rate, boys
blabbo
They were probably cautious about raids.
still a dick move, but I see what they were trying to do.
Go to the rate tab under the page. From ther, you can actually rate it, due to the rating module being broken.
I'm just some dude who realized the module broke. You might want to get it checked. Otherwise, good article.
As it turns out, the white theme on this page is broken.
nice, it actually got me thinking about the ethics of the rcpa
I think this article starts off strong but grows increasingly difficult to read as the quality of writing decreases. By the time we get to the final note, it's very poorly structured and written and makes for a pretty disappointing payoff.
When I see an invincible sentient marble statue, I think of workers that operate the most dangerous tech possessed by humanity, with no fear of death. The Authority thinks of a statue that needs containment, while leaving the dying to humans. When I see a beast of no nation, raining death from above, I think of ways to shoot it down so that the populous may be protected. The Authority sees an anomaly that needs to be monitored, while children get bombed out. When I see that death is late to the party, I become death himself and euthanize people. Your group keeps them alive for your novelty collection.
The punctuation and grammar is all over the place here. The sentences are very poorly connected and are often only divided for the sake of matching the structure of the one before, but then fails to be consistent anyway. This is just the most notable example to me in how rapidly the quality degrades once it gets to the end.
Rather than going out with a dramatic flair, it ends with a middling and supposedly intimidating threat that lacks any real oomph to make it count.
(account deleted)