http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283/a-proper-terminology-page Posts in the discussion thread "A proper terminology page?" - Discussion about if we should create a terminology page and situation regarding to RPCs with incorrect terms. Thu, 12 Mar 2026 22:16:26 +0000 http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283#post-3879453 http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283/a-proper-terminology-page#post-3879453 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:39:41 +0000 Skywit 3030872 I think the guide book project got canned. Blackjack and hookers.

]]> http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283#post-3878419 http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283/a-proper-terminology-page#post-3878419 Thu, 19 Jul 2018 02:00:56 +0000 NormalClown 2068794 Someone using MST isn't looking at Security and Clearance. It's MSF, Mobile Strike Force.

]]> http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283#post-3877749 http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-6460283/a-proper-terminology-page#post-3877749 Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:52:41 +0000 Dat_commie 4264315 Hi,
So as the title suggests, do you think it would be a great idea if we all create a proper terminology page and stick it into "RPC format" page? I've read quite a number of different RPCs that get some terms incorrect (i.e some regard MST into special force or strike team, etc.), therefore it would be much better if the entire wiki follows a proper, professional looking format. To extend to that, it would also be great if we have everyone replace those incorrect terms with the right ones whenever they see one as site-wide collaboration.

]]>