<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Some Object Class Ideas</title>
		<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-16749714/some-object-class-ideas</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Some Object Class Ideas&quot; - Doesn&#039;t need to be official, I just thought these would be cool.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-16749714#post-6458264</guid>
				<title>Re: Some Object Class Ideas</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-16749714/some-object-class-ideas#post-6458264</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 01:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TTPY</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2947029</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <ul> <li><strong>Quasi-Gamma</strong> is self-contradictory as it must both be easy enough to contained initially and impossibly dangerous to be recontained. Anomalies behaving as such usually underwent great changes during its containment, and usually warrant only a simple reclassification instead.</li> <li><strong>Epsilon</strong> was formerly an official Containment Rating for</li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>anomalies that behave above our current perception. As such, there are aspects of their behaviors that cannot be contained or even observed.</p> </blockquote> <div style="padding-left: 40px"> <p>here it again is a Containment Rating based on a certain anomalous property/hazard, the description for this version of Epsilon sounds more like an interesting Containment Protocols than a Containment Class.</p> </div> <ul> <li><strong>Publicari</strong> seems to fit under the broader definition of an Uncontained anomaly. While not a secondary class, it is used as a <a href="http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/system:page-tags/tag/uncontained#pages">tag</a> for articles</li> <li>Depending on the context, <strong>Released</strong> fits under the definition of an Explained/Neutralized anomaly. Some RPCs are not contained, merely monitored.</li> </ul> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-16749714#post-6457818</guid>
				<title>Some Object Class Ideas</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-16749714/some-object-class-ideas#post-6457818</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 13:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
								<wikidot:authorUserId>8449816</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Quasi-Gamma: Given to anomalies who are relatively easy to contain, and can only be let out intentionally. Once let out, the entity is insanely difficult to retrieve and put back in its containment.</p> <p>Epsilon: Contained by saying it is contained. Given to anomalies that have memetic hazards, infohazards, or cognitohazards that may apply to this. Containment is broken when the majority thinks it is breached.</p> <p>Publicari: Has been stolen by a GoI or AoI. The anomaly is no longer in Authority Custody.</p> <p>Released: Self-explanatory.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>