<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;Ordo Veri Crucis&quot;</title>
		<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Ordo Veri Crucis&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 03:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4632099</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4632099</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 11:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
								<wikidot:authorUserId>2669891</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The image formatting's a huge problem for me, makes the article unpleasant to navigate. Other than that, cool concept.</p> <p>3/5</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4446979</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4446979</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Big Mark</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>5709409</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Well, if you do not agree on having your RPC involved, I will keep it out.<br /> I see the Teutons of the order as more of “splinters”, they aren’t actual Templars, Hospitalliers and Teutons, they just carry their appearance and traditions&#8230;it’s more of a way to identify each other.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4446616</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4446616</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
								<wikidot:authorUserId>5928940</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Changed to a 2/5 with some of the fixes.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4446158</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4446158</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 09:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ICFD</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>4930765</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>As much as I love the idea of a crusader portion of the AEP, I cannot deny that this conflicts with one of the current articles, 503. As the writer of said article, I would prefer not to have my article indirectly incorporated into the AEP, as that was not my intention.</p> <p>Besides, the Teutons did their own thing for a long while after the crusades, and were much more concerned with the north. You could pick a better order instead, like the Knights of Santiago.</p> <p>Overall, I like it, but the conflicts in lore are an issue that needs to be dealt with.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4444504</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4444504</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Big Mark</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>5709409</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I totally understand&#8230;variety is a thing, after all. I hope you will appreciate future works better than this.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4444481</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4444481</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
								<wikidot:authorUserId>5928940</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>That's fine. I'm not saying it shouldn't be associated. But there needs to be more going on here for me to vote higher is all.</p> <p>Cheers and good luck with your work.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4444359</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4444359</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Big Mark</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>5709409</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Not a native speaker and got it reviewed, so I’m surprised they let this stuff pass. I had read it countless times and never noticed it.<br /> As for the final thing, I guess it’s just you&#8230;Von said it’s fine so I trust him.<br /> Thanks for feedback</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4444290</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4444290</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
								<wikidot:authorUserId>5928940</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">There&nbsp;are&nbsp;a&nbsp;lot&nbsp;of&nbsp;SpaGr&nbsp;errors.</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <blockquote> <p>Wether you’re just a stray soul or someone who recently</p> </blockquote> <p>Whether*</p> <blockquote> <p>The Order Of The across</p> </blockquote> <p>The Order of the Cross*</p> <blockquote> <p>members of order came from all the great orders of holy knights, such as the knights Templar.</p> </blockquote> <p>members of the* order came from all the great orders of holy knights, such as the Knights* Templar.</p> <blockquote> <p>organisation the AEP</p> </blockquote> <p>comma separates between &quot;organization&quot; and &quot;the&quot;</p> <blockquote> <p>Although religion was the main face of the AEP, now it is just one of the many faces.</p> <p>WE are that face.</p> </blockquote> <p>These two statements contradict one another.</p> <p>Nix the &quot;s&quot; from informations.</p> <blockquote> <p>You are not to unnecessarily come in contact with other faction’s personnel unless your work requires it.</p> </blockquote> <p>Sentence suffers from a double negative. Nix the &quot;unnecessarily&quot; and you would retain the same information.</p> <p>If you need the specificity, you can end the line with &quot;, unless instructed otherwise by your superiors.&quot;</p> <blockquote> <p>You are to take part you religious celebrations</p> </blockquote> <p>in your* religious celebrations</p> <blockquote> <p>querrell</p> </blockquote> <p>quarrel*</p> <blockquote> <p>they cover the role of responding the call</p> </blockquote> <p>responding to* the call</p> <blockquote> <p>possible problem.</p> </blockquote> <p>problems*</p> <blockquote> <p>They take care of writing entries for our holy archives, making researches, forging weapons for our knights, guarding and handling information.</p> </blockquote> <p>This sentence is weirdly worded. You can reword this to &quot;They write entries for our holy archives, conduct research, forge weapons for our knights, guard and handle information distribution.&quot;</p> <p>My reasoning for this is that if you remove the &quot;take care of&quot; from the sentence and remove the &quot;ing&quot; words that express an active voice, the information provided will be clearer.</p> <blockquote> <p>I’d like to address this, although obvious: DO NOT annoy any member of The Order Of The Cross, never, just don’t</p> </blockquote> <p>The &quot;although obvious&quot; is unneeded and the colon can be replaced with a comma as your not starting a list or a new sentence.</p> <p>Second, why wouldn't a member want to NOT annoy other members? Is there a better synonym for the word annoy such as &quot;interfere&quot;? Third, we're never really given a reason for this outside of &quot;-5&quot; stating such.</p> <blockquote> <p>Our three knights orders have all each and different ranks that they use to distinguish each other:</p> </blockquote> <p>I'm very confused by this sentence. Did you mean to say all three of your orders each have these ranks?</p> <p>Additionally, this was never explicitly stated, but is this document on the order written in modern times? You use words like &quot;Trooper&quot; yet also use photos of different members dressed in plate armor.</p> <p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial,_royal_and_noble_ranks#Minor_nobility,_gentry,_and_other_aristocracy">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial,_royal_and_noble_ranks#Minor_nobility,_gentry,_and_other_aristocracy</a></p> </div> </div> </div> <p>There are other errors spread throughout the piece, but those were the standouts for me. I suggest ironing out the spelling and grammar issues prior to final posting.</p> <p>It was hard to read. Combined with that, they didn't seem like an interesting addition to the &quot;Incomplete History of the Authority&quot; canon or the AEP.</p> <p>1/5.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4443525</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4443525</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>THE Ordinary</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>5206754</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>What can i say?I like it. A crusader faction for AEP seems really unique and (in my opinion) has lots of potential. This is definitely a lot better than the old AEP.I hope other guys finish their factions at some point as well.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117#post-4443253</guid>
				<title>New article for AEP</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12851117/ordo-veri-crucis#post-4443253</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Big Mark</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>5709409</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Welp, here it is. Thanks to the AEP community for all the support they gave me, you guys are fantastic.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>