<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>RPC-001 Thread</title>
		<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12669729/rpc-001-thread</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;RPC-001 Thread&quot; - Don&#039;t propose RPC-001 anomalies. Propose ways of submitting and regulating them.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12669729#post-4396039</guid>
				<title>Re: RPC-001 Thread</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12669729/rpc-001-thread#post-4396039</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Liberonscien</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2280149</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I think that RPC-001 articles should be phenomena of a significant nature.<sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-488693-1" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >1</a></sup> I also believe that they should all be compatible with the canon no matter what they are. RPC-001 &quot;The Cosmic Horror&quot;<sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-488693-2" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >2</a></sup>, RPC-001 &quot;The Sun of Nihilism&quot;<sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-488693-3" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >3</a></sup>, and RPC-001 &quot;The Leaders of the AEP Association&quot;<sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-488693-4" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >4</a></sup><sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-488693-5" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >5</a></sup> would all have to be compatible with the canon no matter which one is the community favorite. I think that this would be a good option for determining what &quot;power level&quot; or significance level is acceptable for RPC-001 anomalies.</p> <p>I also think that we should initially slow the production of RPC-001 instances by having increased requirements for getting them approved. We don't want people to neglect the rest of the anomalies by trying to get in their idea of RPC-001.<sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-488693-6" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >6</a></sup></p> <p>I also think that the deletion threshold for anomalies in this section should be higher. I think we want the anomalies in this section to be some of the best that we have. I don't think we want anomalies that would barely pass in the regular section to be our RPC-001s. Thoughts?</p> <div class="footnotes-footer"> <div class="title">Footnotes</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-488693-1"><a href="javascript:;" >1</a>. What is significant enough would be decided by the staff. I believe it is enough to say that a regular talking object would not suffice, for example.</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-488693-2"><a href="javascript:;" >2</a>. An example of a potential RPC-001 instance</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-488693-3"><a href="javascript:;" >3</a>. another example</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-488693-4"><a href="javascript:;" >4</a>. You get the idea</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-488693-5"><a href="javascript:;" >5</a>. Groups of Interest used in examples used because of ease of use in examples</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-488693-6"><a href="javascript:;" >6</a>. I believe that the RPC-001 slot would be too attractive to people if it was treated like a normal article in regards to criticism requirements</div> </div> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12669729#post-4396036</guid>
				<title>RPC-001 Thread</title>
				<link>http://rpcauthority.wikidot.com/forum/t-12669729/rpc-001-thread#post-4396036</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Liberonscien</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2280149</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I don't think we should respond to the announcement and I thought it would be a good idea to have a thread in this section.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>